సంగారెడ్డి, నవంబర్ 25 (ఆంధ్రజ్యోతి) : టీఆర్ఎస్‌తో పొత్తు పెట్టుకోకపోతే
గత ఎన్నికల్లో తామే గెలిచేవారమని తెలుగుదేశం పార్టీ అధినేత చంద్రబాబు
అన్నారు. తాను చెప్పిన విషయాలపై ఆలోచించి,వాస్తవమని నమ్మితే తనకు
సహకరించాలని ప్రజలను కోరారు. "తెలుగుదేశం అధికారంలోకి వస్తే ఇంటికి
పెద్దకొడుకులా మీ జీవితాల్లో ఆనందం నింపుతా''నని చంద్రబాబు హామీ ఇచ్చారు.
మెదక్ జిల్లాలో ఎనిమిదో రోజైన ఆదివారం ఆయన మనూర్ నుంచి నారాయణఖేడ్ వరకు 9
కిలోమీటర్లు నడిచారు.Sunday 25 November 2012
అధికారమిస్తే మీ ఇంట పెద్ద కొడుకునవుతా; చంద్రబాబు
సంగారెడ్డి, నవంబర్ 25 (ఆంధ్రజ్యోతి) : టీఆర్ఎస్‌తో పొత్తు పెట్టుకోకపోతే
గత ఎన్నికల్లో తామే గెలిచేవారమని తెలుగుదేశం పార్టీ అధినేత చంద్రబాబు
అన్నారు. తాను చెప్పిన విషయాలపై ఆలోచించి,వాస్తవమని నమ్మితే తనకు
సహకరించాలని ప్రజలను కోరారు. "తెలుగుదేశం అధికారంలోకి వస్తే ఇంటికి
పెద్దకొడుకులా మీ జీవితాల్లో ఆనందం నింపుతా''నని చంద్రబాబు హామీ ఇచ్చారు.
మెదక్ జిల్లాలో ఎనిమిదో రోజైన ఆదివారం ఆయన మనూర్ నుంచి నారాయణఖేడ్ వరకు 9
కిలోమీటర్లు నడిచారు.
Wednesday 21 November 2012
ఇది చదవండి.. జైలుకు వెళ్లండి
శ్రీక్రిష్ణ జన్మస్థానానికి వెళ్లడమంత సులభం కాదు.
దానికీ కళాపోసనుండాలి. చానా శ్రమపడాలా.
గోడలు దూకాలా, తలుపులు బద్దలుకొట్టాలా,
పీకలు నరకాలా. ఇంకా చానా చానా చేయాలి
కనీసం అవినీతి చేసి జైలుకెళ్లాలన్నా.. బుర్రకు పనే
కాబట్టి జైలుకెళ్లడం అందరూ అనుకునేంత ఈజీ మాత్రంకాదు.
కానీ..
చెమటోడ్చకుండా. సిన్న రక్తం చుక్క సిందించకుండా
గాంధీ మార్గంలో అహింసాయుతంగా
మీ ఇంట్లోని కంప్యూటర్ ముందు నుంచి సరాసరి
జైలుకెళ్లే మార్గం కూడా ఉందండోయ్
ఇందులో మీకు నొప్పి ఉండదు.
బుర్రకూ పని చెప్పక్కర్లేదు
చేయాల్సిందలా... ఇది చదవడమే
Earlier this month the BBC alleged on a news program that a former Tory politician was a child molester. The report, which didn’t actually name the man, was untrue.
But a frenzy of speculation began on Twitter, with thousands of people either tweeting or retweeting the name of Alistair McAlpine — a.k.a. Lord McAlpine, an adviser to Margaret Thatcher when she was prime minister. The BBC has since apologized for sloppy reporting and coughed up £185,000 ($294,000) in damages. But some of those who tweeted about it are facing a probable lawsuit.
Those who repeated the claim include everyone from ordinary tweeters with few followers to high-profile celebrities like British actor Alan Davies with hundreds of thousands of followers. The media is reporting that some 10,000 people could be sued, leading to the largest number of defendants in a case in British legal history.
Of course many of those people were merely doing what most people do on Twitter: passing along gossip, the way they would on Facebook, by text message or by email. But unlike those, Twitter is completely public.
“Twitter is not just a closed coffee shop among friends,” says Andrew Reid, McAlpine’s lawyer. “It goes out to hundreds of thousands of people and you must take responsibility for it. It is not a place where you can gossip and say things with impunity, and we are about to demonstrate that.”
There’s a good chance he’s right, say other libel lawyers. The case has precedence. Earlier this year, Chris Cairns, a professional cricketer, went on trial for match fixing. He was cleared. Cairns turned around and sued for libel a former Indian Premier League chairman, Lalit Modi, who had tweeted about Cairns’ alleged involvement in match-fixing. A judge in London ruled against Modi and awarded Cairns £90,000.
Libel lawyers say the same rules apply in the McAlpine case, and it won’t matter if tweets outright accused McAlpine of child molestation or passed along the BBC report like party gossip.
“All tweeters are equally liable,” says Cairn’s lawyer, Rhory Roberton of Collyer Bristow. “Tweeters who don’t think about what they are doing are vulnerable by nature. Some would say stupid.” More than two dozen people who tweeted the news have reportedly come forward, apologized, and paid a nominal fee to go to charity. But others may not get off so easily.
Over the past year, a number of lawsuits have suggested that Twitter is fair game as a public forum in the eyes of lawyers and judges. One case gained attention perhaps because it sought $1 million in damages for a single tweet and a posting on a not particularly popular blog.
It involved an Oregon woman who blogged and tweeted allegations about a plastic surgeon’s sexual conduct. The doctor had been disciplined in the past for “intimate physical contact” and for suggesting it could serve as pay for treatment, but his public reprimand made no mention of sex. The case was later dropped by the doctor, reported the Oregonian.
Often cases have involved high-profile types who really ought to know better (or at least should be better advised). The musician Courtney Love has been sued at least twice, once by her own former lawyers, over vitriol spewed via Twitter. An NBA referee sued the Associated Press for defamation resulting from a tweet sent by a sports writer suggesting he’d made a bad call to make up for an earlier bad call.
The libel case involving Love and her former lawyers is still ongoing, but the other suits were ultimately dropped or settled. The executive director at the Media Law Resource Center says that as far as the center is aware, no other libel case about something published on Twitter has made it into a US courtroom.
In the UK, at least one Twitter-related case has led to a conviction, though for threats, not libel: In 2010, a man posted a tweet saying he would blow up a South Yorkshire airport if it didn’t reopen soon.
He later said it was a joke: He wanted to see a girl (whom he had met via Twitter) and couldn’t fly out because of a snow closure. The judge didn’t see it that way and fined him roughly £1,000 including costs. The ruling was, however, overturned this past summer, when judges ruled that the tweet wasn’t menacing after all.
But as Twitter becomes more widely used, not just by ordinary people but also by media organizations, such cases are bound to proliferate. Indeed, Twitter exposes traditional media to a kind of risk they’ve never encountered before: The internet can take something that wasn’t a libel and turn it into one.
In the BBC case, McAlpine was not named on Newsnight. The provable defamation happened only when people started guessing at his identity and tweeting his name. Says libel lawyer Robertson, “Had no one tweeted, the BBC would have had an argument that McAlpine was not identified, and thus his claim in libel against them would fail.”
దానికీ కళాపోసనుండాలి. చానా శ్రమపడాలా.
గోడలు దూకాలా, తలుపులు బద్దలుకొట్టాలా,
పీకలు నరకాలా. ఇంకా చానా చానా చేయాలి
కనీసం అవినీతి చేసి జైలుకెళ్లాలన్నా.. బుర్రకు పనే
కాబట్టి జైలుకెళ్లడం అందరూ అనుకునేంత ఈజీ మాత్రంకాదు.
కానీ..
చెమటోడ్చకుండా. సిన్న రక్తం చుక్క సిందించకుండా
గాంధీ మార్గంలో అహింసాయుతంగా
మీ ఇంట్లోని కంప్యూటర్ ముందు నుంచి సరాసరి
జైలుకెళ్లే మార్గం కూడా ఉందండోయ్
ఇందులో మీకు నొప్పి ఉండదు.
బుర్రకూ పని చెప్పక్కర్లేదు
చేయాల్సిందలా... ఇది చదవడమే
Earlier this month the BBC alleged on a news program that a former Tory politician was a child molester. The report, which didn’t actually name the man, was untrue.
But a frenzy of speculation began on Twitter, with thousands of people either tweeting or retweeting the name of Alistair McAlpine — a.k.a. Lord McAlpine, an adviser to Margaret Thatcher when she was prime minister. The BBC has since apologized for sloppy reporting and coughed up £185,000 ($294,000) in damages. But some of those who tweeted about it are facing a probable lawsuit.
Those who repeated the claim include everyone from ordinary tweeters with few followers to high-profile celebrities like British actor Alan Davies with hundreds of thousands of followers. The media is reporting that some 10,000 people could be sued, leading to the largest number of defendants in a case in British legal history.
Of course many of those people were merely doing what most people do on Twitter: passing along gossip, the way they would on Facebook, by text message or by email. But unlike those, Twitter is completely public.
“Twitter is not just a closed coffee shop among friends,” says Andrew Reid, McAlpine’s lawyer. “It goes out to hundreds of thousands of people and you must take responsibility for it. It is not a place where you can gossip and say things with impunity, and we are about to demonstrate that.”
There’s a good chance he’s right, say other libel lawyers. The case has precedence. Earlier this year, Chris Cairns, a professional cricketer, went on trial for match fixing. He was cleared. Cairns turned around and sued for libel a former Indian Premier League chairman, Lalit Modi, who had tweeted about Cairns’ alleged involvement in match-fixing. A judge in London ruled against Modi and awarded Cairns £90,000.
Libel lawyers say the same rules apply in the McAlpine case, and it won’t matter if tweets outright accused McAlpine of child molestation or passed along the BBC report like party gossip.
“All tweeters are equally liable,” says Cairn’s lawyer, Rhory Roberton of Collyer Bristow. “Tweeters who don’t think about what they are doing are vulnerable by nature. Some would say stupid.” More than two dozen people who tweeted the news have reportedly come forward, apologized, and paid a nominal fee to go to charity. But others may not get off so easily.
Over the past year, a number of lawsuits have suggested that Twitter is fair game as a public forum in the eyes of lawyers and judges. One case gained attention perhaps because it sought $1 million in damages for a single tweet and a posting on a not particularly popular blog.
It involved an Oregon woman who blogged and tweeted allegations about a plastic surgeon’s sexual conduct. The doctor had been disciplined in the past for “intimate physical contact” and for suggesting it could serve as pay for treatment, but his public reprimand made no mention of sex. The case was later dropped by the doctor, reported the Oregonian.
Often cases have involved high-profile types who really ought to know better (or at least should be better advised). The musician Courtney Love has been sued at least twice, once by her own former lawyers, over vitriol spewed via Twitter. An NBA referee sued the Associated Press for defamation resulting from a tweet sent by a sports writer suggesting he’d made a bad call to make up for an earlier bad call.
The libel case involving Love and her former lawyers is still ongoing, but the other suits were ultimately dropped or settled. The executive director at the Media Law Resource Center says that as far as the center is aware, no other libel case about something published on Twitter has made it into a US courtroom.
In the UK, at least one Twitter-related case has led to a conviction, though for threats, not libel: In 2010, a man posted a tweet saying he would blow up a South Yorkshire airport if it didn’t reopen soon.
He later said it was a joke: He wanted to see a girl (whom he had met via Twitter) and couldn’t fly out because of a snow closure. The judge didn’t see it that way and fined him roughly £1,000 including costs. The ruling was, however, overturned this past summer, when judges ruled that the tweet wasn’t menacing after all.
But as Twitter becomes more widely used, not just by ordinary people but also by media organizations, such cases are bound to proliferate. Indeed, Twitter exposes traditional media to a kind of risk they’ve never encountered before: The internet can take something that wasn’t a libel and turn it into one.
In the BBC case, McAlpine was not named on Newsnight. The provable defamation happened only when people started guessing at his identity and tweeting his name. Says libel lawyer Robertson, “Had no one tweeted, the BBC would have had an argument that McAlpine was not identified, and thus his claim in libel against them would fail.”
Tuesday 20 November 2012
చంద్రబాబు కొత్త నినాదాన్ని నమ్ముదామా
ఒక్క రోజు మీరివ్వండి(పోలింగ్ రోజు)..
ఐదేళ్లు మీకు మంచి పరిపాలన అందిస్తా
చంద్రబాబు తాజా నినాదం. బాగుందికదూ.
Monday 19 November 2012
చీర కట్టుకుంటే...
చీర వల్ల కూడా క్యాన్సర్ వస్తుందట.
ఈడ చదువుకోండి
Saree cancer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Saree cancer is a type of skin cancer that occurs along the waistline in females wearing the saree,
caused by constant irritation which can result in scaling and changes
in pigmentation of the skin. It is a rare type of cancer and generally
found in the Indian subcontinent, where the saree is a lifetime female costume.[1] It is similar to Marjolin's ulcer in etiology, involving chronic inflammation.Etiology
Signs and symptoms
The foremost symptoms of saree cancer is the constant irritation with scaling and pigmentation change at the waistline; gradually these become chronic. The person may have non-healing ulcer or a hyper- or hypopigmented patch or a growth-like lesion over the waistline. The lesion may be associated with serous discharge with foul smell.[2][3]Management
Excision biopsy is required to confirm the diagnosis of saree cancer. In many cases local excision with skin grafting is considered the appropriate treatment.[2][3][1] Different ways of wearing the petticoat may help saree-wearers to prevent saree cancer. Some such strategies are:- loosening the petticoat
- Changing the usual rope-like belt to broader ones that reduce pressure on the area
- continually changing the level at which the petticoat is tied[1]
History of the disease
References
నాయనా, పయ్యావులా కలత చెందకు
పయ్యావుల కేశవ్ జగన్ పార్టీలోకి వస్తున్నాడని ఓ పత్రికలో వార్త వచ్చింది
మామూలుగా అయితే ఆ వార్తను తీవ్ర పదజాలంతో పయ్యావులు ఖండించాలి
కానీ ఏం చేశాడంటే
ఏడ్చాడు. బాధపడ్డాడు.
కన్నీరు పెట్టుకున్నాడు.
కర్చీఫ్ తో మొహం తుడుచుకున్నాడు.
టీవీ చూస్తున్న నాకు బుర్ర పాడైపోయింది.
కేశవ్కు ఏదో అయిపోయిందనుకున్నా
తీరా చూస్తే... రాజకీయనాయకులకు అలవాటైన తిరకాసువార్తే.
అయినా కంటనీరు ఒలికించాడంటే,
పాపంఎంత బాధపడి ఉంటాడో
బాధపడకు కేశవ్.
ఇది పాడులోకం.
పాపిష్టి లోకం.
మామూలుగా అయితే ఆ వార్తను తీవ్ర పదజాలంతో పయ్యావులు ఖండించాలి
కానీ ఏం చేశాడంటే
ఏడ్చాడు. బాధపడ్డాడు.
కన్నీరు పెట్టుకున్నాడు.
కర్చీఫ్ తో మొహం తుడుచుకున్నాడు.
టీవీ చూస్తున్న నాకు బుర్ర పాడైపోయింది.
కేశవ్కు ఏదో అయిపోయిందనుకున్నా
తీరా చూస్తే... రాజకీయనాయకులకు అలవాటైన తిరకాసువార్తే.
అయినా కంటనీరు ఒలికించాడంటే,
పాపంఎంత బాధపడి ఉంటాడో
బాధపడకు కేశవ్.
ఇది పాడులోకం.
పాపిష్టి లోకం.
చేతిలో కలముందని, ఎదురుగా ఇంటర్నెట్ ఉందని
రాయకండి రాతలు
చేయకండి విమర్శలు
ధిక్కారస్వరాలు వినిపించాలని,
దిక్కులు పిక్కటిల్లేలా అరవాలని
అభిప్రాయాలను వెల్లడించాలని
సమాజాన్నిచైతన్యవంతం చేయాలని
లోగుట్టులు విప్పాలని,
పైపై మెరుగుల బండారాన్ని బయటపెట్టాలని
ప్రయత్నించకండి.
మౌనంగా ఉండండి.
చాతకాకపోతే
కాస్త మత్తు మందు తాగండి.
వేయి ఆలోచనలను
వేల దురాగతాల్ని
మీ గొంతులోనే సమాధి చేయండి.
చేతిలో కలముందని.
ఎదురుగా ఇంటర్నెట్ ఉందని,
రాజ్యాంగం స్వేఛ్చ ఇచ్చిందని,
రాత నా జన్మహక్కని
ప్రపంచంలోని అతిగొప్ప
ప్రజాస్వామ్యంలో పౌరుడినని
నాకు ఎదురేలేదని
విర్రవీగావో..
అదిగో అసీమ్ త్రివేది.
బందిఖానాలో... సంకెళ్లతో
నోట్; అసీమ్ త్రీవేది జైలు కు వెళ్లినప్పడు ఈ టపా రాశాను. ఇప్పడు ముంబయిలో ఇద్దరమ్మాయిల అరెస్టు నేపథ్యంలో మళ్లీ ఈ టపాను పోస్టు చేస్తున్నాను.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)